Volume 11, Issue 1 ((Autumn & Winter) 2022)                   pps 2022, 11(1): 24-35 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

SHAHBAZI H, TARANG A, PADASHT F, HOSSEINI CHALESHTARI M, ALLAHGHOLIPOUR M, KHOSHKDAMAN M, et al . 3-The reaction of 109 rice lines to blast disease. pps. 2022; 11 (1) :24-35
URL: http://yujs.yu.ac.ir/pps/article-1-351-en.html
Rice Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran. , ha.shahbazi@areeo.ac.ir
Abstract:   (442 Views)
Shahbazi H, Tarang A, Padasht F, Hosseini Chaleshtari M, Allah-Gholipour M,  Khoshkdaman M, Mousavi Qaleh Roudkhani SA, Nazari Tabak S, Asadollahi Sharifi F, Pourabbas Dolatabad M (2022) The reaction of 109 rice lines to blast disease. Plant Pathology Science 11(1):24-35.  Doi: 10.2982/PPS.11.1.24.
Introduction: Blast caused by Pyricularia oryzae is the most important fungal disease of rice in the world. The best method of disease management is to identify and cultivate resistant cultivars. Materials and Methods: In this study, the response of 109 promising lines from the Iranian Rice Research Institute along with three control cultivars (susceptible and resistant) to blast disease was evaluated. Seeds of each line were sown in an upland nursery to assess leaf blast in early July. In order to inoculate the desired lines, leaves infected with the blast were collected from different areas of Guilan Province and placed on the surface of the rice blast nursery. In all stages, the necessary humidity to cause disease was provided by sprinkler irrigation. The severity of the disease was rated from zero to nine using the standard method of the International Rice Research Institute. Seedlings were grown in large pots in the greenhouse and inoculated by injection into the panicle neck to assess panicle burst. Results: Seven and 14 lines with grades 2 and 3 showed resistance to leaf blast. Other lines ranged from relatively susceptible to very susceptible to the disease. Three lines TH1, TH2, and TH3 with a degree of contamination of 5 were susceptible to panicle blast disease. Conclusion: Twenty-one known blast-resistant lines can be used in the rice cultivars breeding program.
Full-Text [PDF 495 kb]   (126 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

1. Amanzadeh M, Moumeni A, Okhovat M, Javan Nikkhah M, Khosravi V (2008) Evaluation of resistance of rice to leaf and panicle blast in Mazandaran province. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 11: 209-219. (In Persian with English Abstract).
2. Baker B, Zambryski P, Staskawicz B, Dinesh-Kumar SP (1997) Signaling in plant-microbe interactions. Science 276:726-733. [DOI:10.1126/science.276.5313.726] [PMID]
3. Berger RD, Luke HH (1979) Spatial and temporal spread of oat crown rust. Phytopathology 69:1199-1201. [DOI:10.1094/Phyto-69-1199]
4. D'Ávila LS, De Filippi MCC, Café-Filho AC (2021) Sensitivity of Pyricularia oryzae populations to fungicides over a 26-year time frame in Brazil. Plant Disease 105:1771-1780. [DOI:10.1094/PDIS-08-20-1806-RE] [PMID]
5. Han SS, Ryu JD, Shim HS, Lee SW, Hong YK, Cha KH (2001) Breakdown of resistant cultivars by new race KI-1117a and race distribution of rice blast fungus during 1999-2000 in Korean. Research Plant Disease 7:86-92.
6. IRRI (2013) Standard Evaluation System (SES) for Rice. IRRI Los Baños, Philippines.
7. Khosravi V (2013) Evaluation of the response of promising rice lines to fungi causing rice blast and sheath blight diseases. Rice Research Institute of Iran Press. Iran. 24p. (In Persian with English Abstract).
8. Long DH, Lee FN, TeBeest DO (2000) Effect of nitrogen fertilization on disease progress of rice blast on susceptible and resistant cultivars. Plant Disease 84:403-409. [DOI:10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.4.403] [PMID]
9. Mackill DJ, Bonman JM (1992) Inheritance of blast resistance in near-isogenic lines of rice. Phytopathology 82:746-749. [DOI:10.1094/Phyto-82-746]
10. Moumeni A, Yazdi-samadi B, Leung H (2003) An assessment of partial resistance to Pyricularia grisea in rice cultivars. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science 34:483-493. (In Persian with English Abstract).
11. Padasht F (2011) Study of Resistance of IRRI Rice lines to blast disease caused by Pyricularia oryzae in north of Iran. Final report of Research Project. Rice research Institute of Iran Press. Iran. 23p. (In Persian with English Abstract).
12. Padasht F, Khosravi V. Dodabinejad A, Porfarhang H, Dariush S (2012) Efficacy of a mixture fungicide tricyclazole+thiophanate methyl in comparison with some commonly used fungicides in controlling of rice blast disease in Northern Iran. Cereal Research 2:317-28. (In Persian with English Abstract).
13. Padasht F (2015) Evaluation of the response of promising rice lines to fungi causing rice blast and sheath blight diseases. Rice Research Institute of Iran Press. Iran. 24p. (In Persian with English Abstract).
14. Salman EK, Ghoniem KE, Badr ES, Emeran AA (2022). The potential of dimetindene maleate inducing resistance to blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae through activating the salicylic acid signaling pathway in rice plants. Pest Management Science 78:633-642. [DOI:10.1002/ps.6673] [PMID]
15. Suh JP, Roh JH, Cho YC, Han SS, Kim YG, Jena KK (2009) The Pi40 gene for durable resistance to rice blast and molecular analysis of Pi40-advanced backcross breeding lines. Phytopathology 99:243-250. [DOI:10.1094/PHYTO-99-3-0243] [PMID]
16. Torres CQ, Teng PS (1993) Path coefficient and regression analysis of the effects of leaf and panicle blast on tropical rice yield. Crop Protection 12:296-302. [DOI:10.1016/0261-2194(93)90050-S]
17. Yadav MK, Ngangkham U, Shubudhi HN, Bag MK, Adak T, Munda S, Samantaray S, Jena M (2017) Use of molecular markers in identification and characterization of resistance to rice blast in India. Plos One 12:e0176236. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179467 [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0176236] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Yeh WH, Bonman JM (1986) Assessment of partial resistance to Pyricularia oryzae in six rice cultivars. Plant Pathology 35:319-323. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3059.1986.tb02021.x]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | University of Yasouj Plant Pathology Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb