Volume 10, Issue 2 ((Spring and Summer) 2021)                   Plant Pathol. Sci. 2021, 10(2): 82-92 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Soleymani S, Tahmasebi Z, Mehrabi A A, Kanouni H. (2021). Agronomic traits of twenty-one resistant, semi-resistant and susceptible chickpea genotypes to blight disease. Plant Pathol. Sci.. 10(2), 82-92. doi:10.52547/pps.10.2.82
URL: http://yujs.yu.ac.ir/pps/article-1-352-en.html
Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran , Z.TAHMASEBI@ILAM.AC.IR
Abstract:   (2020 Views)
Soleymani SH, Tahmasebi Z, Asherf Mehrabi A, Kanouni M (2021). Agronomic traits of twenty-one resistant, semi-resistant and susceptible chickpea genotypes to blight disease. Plant Pathology Science 10(2): 82-92.  Doi: 10.2982/PPS.10.2.82.
 
Introduction: Blight caused by Ascochyta rabiei is the most destructive disease of chickpea worldwide. Identification of agronomic and morphological properties of disease-resistant cultivars is necessary to set up a suitable chickpea breeding program. Materials and Methods: Twelve agronomic and morphological properties of 21 resistant, semi-resistant, and susceptible chickpea genotypes were investigated in a field experiment in a randomized complete block design with six replications in one agronomic year in western Iran. Results: All genotypes were divided into three main clusters based on the UPGMA dendrogram. The lowest yielding genotypes were located in cluster II and IDDMAR-2012-32 genotype was susceptible to disease and desi-type in this cluster. The genotypes with the highest yield were placed in cluster III, and the genotype Gebres 419-2 was resistant to the disease and the desi-type in this cluster. Among the Kabuli-type genotypes, ILC482 was included in cluster III as a high-yielding and semi-disease-resistant cultivar, and low-yielding FLIp-02-65C and FLIp-01-164C lines along with disease resistance were included in cluster I. Conclusion: Gebres 419-2 can be crossed with FLIp-02-65C or FLIp-01-164C to produce robust, high-yielding Kabuli chickpea varieties with large seeds.
Full-Text [PDF 969 kb]   (804 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/11/30 | Accepted: 2021/12/22

References
1. Ali SR, Iqbal SM, Iqbal U, Ghafoor A, Akram A (2009) Pathogenic diversity in Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Lib. of chickpea. Pakistan Journal of Botany 41:413-419.
2. Aslamshad M, Pervez H, Zafar Z, Zia-Ul-Haq M, Nawz H (2009) Evaluation of Biochemical Composition and Physiochemical Parameters of from Seeds of Desi Chickpea Varieties Cultivation in Arid Zones of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany 41:655-662.
3. Bakhsh A, Wahid M A, Bugt RA, Zahid MA, Ali, S (2003) Evaluation of Chickpea Germplasm for Semi-Arid Zones of Baluchistan. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 5:113-116.
4. Bharadwaj C, Chauhan SK, Yadav S, Tara Satyavathi C, Singh R, Kumar J, Rajguru G (2011) Molecular marker-based linkage map of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) developed from desi× Kabuli cross. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 18:116-124.
5. Chen W, Coyne CJ, PeeverTL, Muehlbauer FJ (2004) Characterization of chickpea differentials for pathogenicity assay of ascochyta blight and identification of chickpea accessions resistant to Didymella rabiei. Plant Pathology 53:759-769. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2004.01103.x]
6. Cho S, Chen W, Muehlbauer FJ (2004) Pathotype-specific genetic factors in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) for quantitative resistance to ascochyta blight. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109:733-739. [DOI:10.1007/s00122-004-1693-x] [PMID]
7. Chongo G, Gossen BD (2001) Effect of plant age on resistance to Ascochyta rabiei in chickpea. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 23:358-363. [DOI:10.1080/07060660109506956]
8. Chongo G, Gossen BD, Buchwaldt L, Adhikari T, Rimmer SR (2004) Genetic diversity of Ascochyta rabiei in Canada. Plant Disease 88:4-10. [DOI:10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.1.4] [PMID]
9. Choudhary P, Khanna SM, Jain PK, Bharadwaj C, Kumar J, Lakhera PC, Srinivasan R (2012) Genetic structure and diversity analysis of the primary gene pool of chickpea using SSR markers. Genetics and Molecular Research 11:891-905. [DOI:10.4238/2012.April.10.5] [PMID]
10. Gaure P M, Tripathi S, Gowda CLL, Ranga RG V, Sharma HC, Pande S, Sharma M (2010) Chickpea seed production manual. Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics 6:361-363.
11. Kanouni H, Taleei A, Okhovat M (2011) Ascochyta blight (Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Lab.) of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): Breeding strategies for resistance. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics 5:1-22. [DOI:10.3923/ijpbg.2011.1.22]
12. Khan R, Farhatullah, Khan H. (2011) Dissection of genetic variability and heritability estimates of chickpea germplasm for various morphological markers and quantitative traits. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 27:67-72.
13. Malik SR, Bakhsh A, Ahsan MA, Iqbal U, Iqbal SM (2009) Assessment of Genetic Variability and Interrelationship among some Agronomic Traits in Chickpea. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12:1814-9596.
14. Pande SK, Siddique HMS, Kishore KHM, Bayaa GK, Gaur B, Gowda PM, Bretag TW, Crouch JH (2005) Ascochyta blight of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review of biology, pathogenicity, and disease management. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56:317-332. [DOI:10.1071/AR04143]
15. Qureshi AS Shaukat A, Bakhsh A, Arshad M, Ghafoor A (2004) Assessment of Variability for Economically Important Traits in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany 36:779-785.
16. Rani U, Singh S, Basandrai AK, Rathee VK, Tripathi K, Singh N, Singh K (2020) Identification of novel resistant sources for ascochyta blight (Ascochyta rabiei) in chickpea. PLOS ONE 15(10): e0240589. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0240589] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Singh KB, Reddy MV (1993) Susceptibility of the chickpea plant to ascochyta blight at different stages of crop growth. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 32:153-155. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200040067x]
18. Srivastava AK, Dixit GP, Chaturvedi SK, Singh NP, Nisar M (2016) Genetic relatedness among desi and Kabuli chickpea varieties of India. Legume Research 29:7-9.
19. Tesfamichael SM, Githiri SM, Nyende AB, Rao NVPRG (2015) Variation for agro-morphological traits among Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 7:75-92. [DOI:10.5539/jas.v7n7p75]
20. Udupa SM, Baum M (2003) Genetic dissection of pathotype specific resistance to Ascochyta blight disease in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) using microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106:1196-1202. [DOI:10.1007/s00122-002-1168-x] [PMID]
21. Varshney R K, Son C, Saxena R K, Azam S, Yu S, Sharpe A G, Cannon S, Baek J, Rosen B, Tar'an B, Millan,T (2013) Draft genome sequence of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) provides a resource for trait improvement. Nature Biotechnology 31:240-246. [DOI:10.1038/nbt.2491] [PMID]
22. Ward Jr J H (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58:236-244. [DOI:10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | University of Yasouj Plant Pathology Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb