Volume 4, Issue 2 ((Autumn & Winter) 2018)
Iranian J. Seed Res. 2018, 4(2): 79-91 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Taghi Zoghi S, Soltani E, Alahdadi I, Sadeghi R. (2018). The Effects of Different Priming Methods on the Storability and Germination under Salinity Stress in Rapeseed (Brassica napus) Line Karaj 3. Iranian J. Seed Res.. 4(2), 79-91. doi:10.29252/yujs.4.2.79
URL: http://yujs.yu.ac.ir/jisr/article-1-280-en.html
URL: http://yujs.yu.ac.ir/jisr/article-1-280-en.html
Aboureihan Campus University of Tehran, Pakdasht, Tehran, Iran , elias.soltani@ut.ac.ir
Abstract: (16370 Views)
This study was conducted to study the effects of different priming methods on germination rate and percentage under salinity stress and to determine the stability of primed seeds. In order to accomplish this, three different experiments were conducted separately, including the experiment of water uptake, the experiment of salinity stress, and the experiment of storability of primed seeds. Priming treatments were five levels of control (unprimed), hydropriming (Hyd), priming with humic acid (HA), priming with salicylic acid (SA) and priming with gibberellic acid (GA). Salinity stresses were four levels of 0, 4, 8 and 12 ds/m of NaCl. The stability of prime seeds was investigated over a period of 226 days after priming. The results of water uptake showed that rapeseeds entered into the third phase of water uptake after 18 hours of hydration. The results of the salinity experiment showed that salinity levels of 12 and 0 ds/m had the lowest (74.3 %) and highest (83 %) germination percentage, respectively. In terms of germination rate, there were significant differences between GA (0.034 h-1), HA (0.036 h-1) and Hyd (0.036 h-1) with C (0.019 h-1) and SA (0.027 h-1). Generally speaking, primed seeds germinated better than control seeds at all levels of salinity. The storability of primed seeds and control seeds had no significant decrease during storage. Finally, it was concluded that seed priming increased the tolerance to salinity stress; in terms of storability, there was no significant difference between primed seeds and primed seeds could be stored in the same way as control seeds.
Highlights:
- At the current research, the stability of prime seeds was investigated for the first time.
- There was no significant difference between the storability of primed seeds and control (unprimed) at each sampling time (with an exception for SA).
- Primed seeds had better germination performance than control at the all salinity stress levels.
- Seed priming treatments using gibberellic acid, humic acid and hydropriming were the best compared with the other treatments.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Seed Physiology
Received: 2017/06/13 | Revised: 2018/09/29 | Accepted: 2018/01/30 | ePublished: 2018/04/12
Received: 2017/06/13 | Revised: 2018/09/29 | Accepted: 2018/01/30 | ePublished: 2018/04/12
References
1. Ashraf, M., and Rauf, H. 2001. Inducing salt tolerate in maize (Zea mays L.) through seed priming with chloride salts: growth and ion transport at early growth stages. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 23(4): 407-414. [DOI:10.1007/s11738-001-0050-9]
2. Basra, S.M.A., Ahmad, N., Khan, M.M., Iqbal, N., and Cheema, M.A. 2003. Assessment of cottonseed deterioration during accelerated ageing. Seed Science and Technology, 31(3): 531-540. [DOI:10.15258/sst.2003.31.3.02]
3. Basra, S.M.A., Ashraf, M., Iqbal, N., Khaliq, A., and Ahmad, R. 2004. Physiological and biochemical aspects of pre-sowing heat stress on cottonseed. Seed Science and Technology, 32(3): 765-774. [DOI:10.15258/sst.2004.32.3.12]
4. Basra, S.M.A., Farooq, M., and Tabassum, R. 2005. Physiological and biochemical aspects of seed vigour enhancement treatments in fine rice (Oryza sativa L.). Seed Science and Technology, 33(3): 623-628. [DOI:10.15258/sst.2005.33.3.09]
5. Bittencourt, M.L.C., Dias, D.C., Dias, L.A., and Araújo, E.F. 2005. Germination and vigour of primed Asparagus seeds. Scientia Agricola, 62(4): 319-324. [DOI:10.1590/S0103-90162005000400003]
6. De Figueiredo, E., Albuquerque, M.C., and De Carvalho, N.M. 2003. Effect of the type of environmental stress on the emergence of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), soybean (Glycine max L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) seeds with different levels of vigor. Seed Science and Technology, 31(2): 465-479. [DOI:10.15258/sst.2003.31.2.23]
7. Demir Kaya, M., Okçu, G., Atak, M., Çikili, Y., and Kolsarici, Ö. 2006. Seed treatment to overcome salt and drought stress during germination in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). European Journal of Agronomy, 24(4): 291-295. [DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2005.08.001]
8. Dhar, U., Pangtey, Y.P.S., and Tewari, A. 1999. Seed deterioration studies in Indian butter tree (Aisandra butyracea (Roxb.) Baehni). Seed Science and Technology, 27(3): 963-968.
9. Farooq, M., Basra, S.M.A., Khalid, M., Tabassum, R., and Mahmood, T. 2006a. Nutrient homeostasis, metabolism of reserves and seedling vigor as affected by seed priming in coarse rice. Botany, 84(8): 1196-1202. [DOI:10.1139/b06-088]
10. Farooq, M., Shahrzad, M., and Basra, A. 2006b. Priming of field-sown rice seed enhances germination, seedling establishment, allometry and yield. Plant Growth Regulation, 49(2-3): 285-294. [DOI:10.1007/s10725-006-9138-y]
11. Foti, S., Cosentino, S.L., Patane, C., and Agosta, G.M.D. 2002. Effects of osmoconditioning upon seed germination of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under low temperatures. Seed Science and Technology, 30(3): 521-533.
12. Fujikara, Y., Kraak, H.L., Basra, A.S., and Karssen, C.M. 1993. Hydropriming, a simple and inexpensive priming method. University Microfilms International, 300 North Zeeb Road, Box 91, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 (USA).
13. Harris, D., Pathan, A.K., Gothkar, P., Joshi, A., Chivasa, W., and Nyamudeza, P. 2001. On-farm seed priming: using participatory methods to revive and refine a key technology. Agricultural Systems, 69(1-2): 151-164. [DOI:10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00023-3]
14. Hus, J.L., and Sung, J.M. 1997. Antioxidant role of glutathione associated with accelerated agina and hydration of triploid Watermelon seeds. Physiologa Plantarum, 100(4): 967-974.
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1997.1000424.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb00024.x]
15. Iqbal, M., and Ashraf, M. 2006. Wheat seed priming in relation to salt tolerance: growth, yield and levels of free salicylic acid and polyamines. In Annales Botanici Fennici, 250-259.
16. Kader, M.A., and Jutzi, S.C. 2004. Effects of thermal and salt treatments during imbibition on germination and seedling growth of sorghum at 42/19˚C. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190(1): 35-38. [DOI:10.1046/j.0931-2250.2003.00071.x]
17. Khajeh-Hosseini, M., Lomholt, A., and Matthews, S. 2009. Mean germination time in the laboratory estimates the relative vigour and field performance of commercial seed lots of maize (Zea mays L.). Seed Science and Technology, 37(2): 446-456. [DOI:10.15258/sst.2009.37.2.17]
18. Khan, A.A. 1992. Preplant physiological seed conditioning. Jamck, M.J. (ed.), Horticultural reviews. John Wiley and Sons., New York, 131-181. [DOI:10.1002/9780470650509.ch4]
19. Khan, M.A., and Gulzar, S. 2003. Germination responses of Sporobolus ioclados: A saline desert grass. Journal of Arid Environments, 53(3): 387-394. [DOI:10.1006/jare.2002.1045]
20. Kuppusamy, N., and Ranganathan, U. 2014. Storage potential of primed seeds of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) and beet root (Beta vulgaris). Australian Journal of Crop Science, 8(9): 1290-1297.
21. Larsen, S.U., Bailly, C., Côme, D., and Corbineau, F. 2004. Use of the hydrothermal time model to analyse interacting effects of water and temperature on germination of three grass species. Seed Science Research, 14(1): 35-50. [DOI:10.1079/SSR2003153]
22. Lee, S.S., and Kim, J.H. 2000. Total Sugars, α-Amylase Activity and Germination after Priming of Normal and Aged Rice Seeds. Korean Journal of Crop Science, 45(2): 108-111.
23. Liu, Y., Bino, R.J., van der Burg, W.J., Groot, S.P.C., and Hilhorst, H.W.M. 1996. Effects of osmotic priming on dormancy and storability of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) seeds. Seed Science Research, 6(2): 49-55. [DOI:10.1017/S0960258500003020]
24. Mahajan, G., Sarlach, R.S., Japinder, S., and Gill, M.S. 2011. Seed priming effects on germination, growth and yield of dry direct-seeded rice. Journal of Crop Improvement, 25(4): 409-417. [DOI:10.1080/15427528.2011.576381]
25. Matsushima, K.I., and Sakagami, J.I. 2013. Effects of seed hydropriming on germination and seedling vigor during emergence of rice under different soil moisture conditions. American Journal of Plant Science, 4(8): 1584-1593. [DOI:10.4236/ajps.2013.48191]
26. McDonald, M.B. 1999. Seed deterioration: physiology, repair and assessment. Seed Science and Technology, 27: 177-237.
27. Murungu, F.S., Nyamugafata, P., Chiduza, C., Clark, L.J., and Whalley, W.R. 2003. Effects of seed priming aggregate size and soil matric potential on emergence of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.). Soil and Tillage Research, 74(2): 161-168. [DOI:10.1016/j.still.2003.06.003]
28. Seefeldt, S.S., Kidwell, K.K., and Waller, J.E. 2002. Base growth temperature, germination rate and growth response of contemporary spring wheat cultivars from the USA Pacific North West. Field Crop Research, 75: 47-52. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00007-2]
29. Serrano, R., Macia, F.C., and Moreno, V. 1999. Genetic engineering of salt and drought tolerance with yeast regulatory genes. Scientia Horticulturae, 78(1-4): 261-269. [DOI:10.1016/S0304-4238(98)00196-4]
30. Simon, E.W. 1984. Early events in germination. In: Murray, D.R. (ed.). Seed physiology: germination and reserve mobilization. Academic Press, Orlando, FL. 77-115. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-511902-3.50008-7]
31. Soltani, A., Galeshi, S., Zenali E., and Latifi, N. 2001. Germinating seed reserve utilization and growth of chickpea as affected by salinity and seed size. Seed Science and Technology, 30: 51-60.
32. Soltani, E., Galeshi, S., Kamkar, B. and Akramghaderi, F. 2009.The effect of seed aging on seedling growth as affected by environmental factors in wheat. Research Journal of Environmental Science, 3: 184-192. [DOI:10.3923/rjes.2009.184.192]
33. Soltani, E., Soltani, A. and Oveisi, M. 2013. Modeling Seed Aging Effect on Wheat Seedling Emergence in Drought Stress: Optimizing Germin Program to Predict Emergence Pattern. Journal of Crop Improvement, 15(2): 147-160. [In Persian with English Summary].
34. Soltani, E., and Farzaneh, S. 2014. Hydrotime analysis for determination of seed vigour in cotton. Seed Science and Technology, 42(2): 260-273. [DOI:10.15258/sst.2014.42.2.14]
35. Soltani, E., and Soltani, A. 2015. Meta-analysis of seed priming effects on seed germination, seedling emergence and crop yield: Iranian studies. International Journal of Plant Production, 9(3): 413-432.
36. Srinivasan, K., Saxena, S., and Singh, B.B. 1999. Osmo- and hydropriming of mustard seeds to improve vigour and some biochemical activities. Seed Science and Technology, 27(2): 785-789.
37. Tekrony, D.M., and Egli, D.B. 1997. Accumulation of seed vigour during development and maturation. In Basic and applied aspects of seed biology, Springer, Dordrecht, 369-384. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-011-5716-2_41]
38. Toselli, M.E., and Casenave, E.C. 2003. Water content and the effectiveness of hydro and osmotic priming of cotton seeds. Seed Science and Technology, 31(3): 727-735. [DOI:10.15258/sst.2003.31.3.21]
39. Varier, A., Vari, A.K., and Dadlani, M. 2010. The subcellular basis of seed priming. Current Science, 99: 450-456.
40. Weber, E.A., Frick, K., Gruber, S., and Claupein, W. 2010. Research and development towards a laboratory method for testing the genotypic predisposition of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) to secondary dormancy. Seed Science and Technology, 38(2): 298-310. [DOI:10.15258/sst.2010.38.2.03]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
