Volume 9, Issue 1 (3-2020)                   pps 2020, 9(1): 91-100 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mehrabioun Mohammadi M, Ahmadi N, Arzanlou M. Dutch elm disease. pps. 2020; 9 (1) :91-100
URL: http://yujs.yu.ac.ir/pps/article-1-304-en.html
Department of Plant Protection, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran , arzanlou@tabrizu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (649 Views)
Mehrabioun Mohammadi M, Ahmadi N, Arzanlou M (2020) Dutch elm disease. Plant Pathology Science 9(1):91-100.         DOI: 10.2982/PPS.9.1.91.

Elm trees are one of the most important ornamental trees and are widely used in the design of urban green spaces. Dutch elm disease is recognized as one of the most important elm diseases in the world. The disease has become an epidemic worldwide and at least three species of Ophiostoma including O. ulmi, O. novo-ulmi and O. Himal-ulmi that differ in geographical distribution and invasion power, are involved in this disease. In Iran, O. ulmi and O. novo-ulmi are known to involve in this disease, with O. novo-ulmi being more virulent. Management of the disease is mainly achieved through preventive and quarantine methods, health measures, resistant cultivars and the use of chemical compounds. Various aspects of the disease, including disease symptoms and signs, pathogen biology and ecology, disease management methods are reviewed in this paper.
Full-Text [PDF 1177 kb]   (168 Downloads)    
Type of Study: EXTENTIONAL | Subject: General

References
1. Afsharpour F, Adeli E (1974) Dutch elm disease Ceratocystis ulmi (Buisman) C. moreau in Iran. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. Technical Publications. 27p.
2. Brasier CM (1986) Dutch elm disease-Ophiostoma (Ceratocystis) ulmi The emergence of EAN and NAN hybrids in Europe. Report on Forest Research 37p.
3. Brasier CM and Kirk SA )2001( Designation of the EAN and NAN races of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi as subspecies. Mycological Research 105:547-554. [DOI:10.1017/S0953756201004087]
4. Duchesne LC (1993) Mechanisms Of Resistance: Can They Help Save Susceptible Elms In Dutch Elm Disease Research. Springer, New York, NY. 239-254 [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4615-6872-8_20]
5. Faccoli M (2001) Elm bark beetles and Dutch elm disease: tests of combined control. Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde. Journal of Pest Science 74:22-29. [DOI:10.1046/j.1439-0280.2001.00033.x]
6. Hafez M, Hausner G (2011) The highly variable mitochondrial small-subunit ribosomal RNA gene of Ophiostoma minus. Fungal Biology 115:1122-1137. [DOI:10.1016/j.funbio.2011.07.007]
7. Jürisoo L, Adamson K, Padari A, Drenkhan R (2019) Health of elms and Dutch elm disease in Estonia. European Journal of Plant Pathology 154:823-41. [DOI:10.1007/s10658-019-01707-0]
8. Murdoch CW, Campana RJ (1983) Bacterial species associated with wet wood of elm. Phytopathology, 73:1270-1273. [DOI:10.1094/Phyto-73-1270]
9. Phillips DH, Burdekin DA (1982) Diseases of elm (Ulmus spp.). pp. 259-275. In: Diseases of Forest and Ornamental Trees. Palgrave Macmillan, London. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-349-06177-8_14]
10. Rahnama K, Taheri, AH (2004) Distribution of Dutch elm disease pathogens, aggressive and non-aggressive isolates in Iran. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 26:121-126.
11. Repe A, Jurc M. (2010) Ophiostomatoid fungi (Ascomycota: Ophiostomataceae) associated with bark beetles and their possible economic impact in forests and timber production. Zbornik Gozdarstva in Lesarstva 91:3-12.
12. Santini A, Faccoli, M (2015) Dutch elm disease and elm bark beetles: a century of association. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry 8:126. [DOI:10.3832/ifor1231-008]
13. Scheffer RJ (1983) Biological control of Dutch elm disease by Pseudomonas species. Annals of Applied Biology 103:21-30. [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1983.tb02736.x]
14. Scheffer RJ and Elgersma DM (1982) A scanning electron microscope study of cell wall degradation in elm wood by aggressive and non‐aggressive isolates of Ophiostoma ulmi. European Journal of Forest Pathology 12:25-28. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0329.1982.tb01368.x]
15. Scheffer RJ, Voeten JG and Guries RP (2008) Biological control of Dutch elm disease. Plant Disease 92:192-200. [DOI:10.1094/PDIS-92-2-0192]
16. Sinclair WA, Lyon HH and Johnson WT (1987) Diseases of trees and shrubs. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY.
17. Smalley EB and Guries RP (1993) Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 3:325-354. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.py.31.090193.001545]
18. Stipes RJ and Campana RJ (1981) Compendium of elm diseases. The American Phytopathological Society. Saint Paul, Minnesota.
19. Stipes RJ (2000) The Management of Dutch elm disease. Pp.157-172. In: Dunn CP, The elms - Breeding, Conservation and Disease Management. Boston, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4615-4507-1_9]
20. Strobel G, Ford E, Worapong J, Harper JK, Arif AM, Grant DM, Fung PC, Chau MW (2002) Isopestacin, an isobenzofuranone from Pestalotiopsis microspora, possessing antifungal and antioxidant activities. Phytochemistry 60:179-183. [DOI:10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00062-6]
21. Temple B, Horgen PA, Bernier L, Hintz WE (1997) Cerato-ulmin, a hydrophobin secreted by the causal agents of Dutch elm disease, is a parasitic fitness factor. Fungal Genetics and Biology 22:39-53. [DOI:10.1006/fgbi.1997.0991]
22. Tubby KV, Webber JF (2010) Pests and diseases threatening urban trees under a changing climate. Forestry 83:451-459. [DOI:10.1093/forestry/cpq027]
23. Voeten J (2003) Dutch trig®: a decade of successful biological control of dutch elm disease in Europe and the USA. In Elm Conference Abstracts, p.35.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2021 All Rights Reserved | University of Yasouj Journals System Plant Pathology Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb