Volume 3, Issue 2 (3-2017)                   jfer 2017, 3(2): 81-94 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Assistant Professor, Faculty of Natural Resource and Environment, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran , ghasemifarhad@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (6579 Views)
Background and objectives: The recent movements opposing deforestation are indicative of the fact that in most programs carried out, less attention has been paid to the socio-economic status of the local people. In extensive deforestation, rural communities play a significant role. Therefore, this study examines the role of economic and social factors in the destruction of the forests of the Oulad Ghobad regions.Materials and methods: This research was carried out as a field study, using a questionnaire. The population comprised 398 families living on the outskirts of the Saman-e Orfi Forest in the Oulad Ghobad region. Out of this population, 150 families were randomly chosen, using Cochran’s sample size formula. Furthermore, 40 questionnaires were distributed among the officers of Lorestan Natural Resources Office. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire established by a pre-test and Cronbach's alpha were 0.83 for local people and 0.705 for officers, respectively.Results: The findings showed that from the viewpoints of both officers and local people, human factors (such as lack of agricultural lands, conversion of forests into agricultural lands by forest dwellers, poverty and and low income, and high unemployment rate) contribute more to deforestation, compared to natural factors (such as drought and forest fire). As for prioritizing human and natural factors contributing to deforestation, the results showed that according to local people, lack of agricultural lands (mean rank of 7.58), and according to officers, conversion of forests to agricultural lands by foresters (mean rank of 11.25) were the main contributing factors. In addition, the results showed that there was a significant negative relationship between income and the factors contributing to deforestation (P <0.001).
Conclusion: In general, the results showed that human factors have a significant effect on the deforestation of the Oulad Ghobad region of Koohdasht and  the role of human factors is more conspicuous compared to natural factors.
 
Full-Text [PDF 516 kb]   (2932 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2016/08/31 | Accepted: 2018/04/11

References
1. خانجاني شيراز، ب. و همتي، ا. 1384. بررسي تأثير عوامل انساني و چراي دام در تغيير ساختار توده‌هاي جنگلي و عدم توسعه پايدار در حوزه آبخيز (مطالعه موردي حوزه 9 سري 9) گيلان. همایش ملی آینده جنگل‌های ایران، انجمن علمی جنگلبانی ایران، دانشکده منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران. 10-1.
2. فتاحی، م. 1373. بررسی جنگل¬های بلوط زاگرس و مهم‌ترین عوامل تخریب آن. انتشارات موسسه تحقیقات جنگل¬ها و مراتع، 63 ص.
3. فتاحی، م.، انصاری، ن.، عباسی، ح.ر. و خان‌حسنی، م. 1379. مدیریت جنگل¬های زاگرس (منطقه موردی: جنگل¬های دار بادام کرمانشاه). انتشارات موسسه تحقیقات جنگل¬ها و مراتع، 471 ص.
4. کوشانفر، ع. 1388. عوامل و سرعت تخریب منابع طبیعی استان لرستان. مجموعه مقالات نخستین همایش بررسی راهکارهای حفاظت از منابع طبیعی استان لرستان، دانشگاه پیام نور، خرم‌آباد. 47-35.
5. گراوند، ز. 1392. جایگاه زغالگیری در نظام معیشتی ساکنان منطقه اولادقباد. پایان¬نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه کردستان، ایران، 95 ص.
6. مؤمنی، م. و فعال قیومی، ع. 1389. تحلیل‌های آماری با استفاده از spss، انتشارات علم و دانش، 312 ص.
7. ناصری، ب.، حسینی، ا. 1388. بررسی عوامل تخریب جنگل¬های بنه شهرستان ایلام (مطالعه موردی: منطقه آبزا). مجموعه مقالات سومین همایش ملی جنگل، انجمن جنگلبانی ایران، دانشکده منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران. کرج. 12-1.
8. Bablo, B., Muys, B., Negu, F., Tollens, E., Nyssen, J., Deckers, J. & Mathis, E. 2009. The economic contribution of forest resource use to rural livelihoods in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(2): 109-117. [DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.007]
9. Hamilton, L.S. 1987. What are the impacts of Himalayan deforestation on Gangese Brahamaputra lowlands and delta?. Mountain Research and Development, 7: 256-263. [DOI:10.2307/3673202]
10. Ives, J.D. & Messerli, B. 1989. The himalayan dilemma: Reconciling environment and development, Routledge, London, UK, 295p.
11. Landry, J. & Chirwa, W.P. 2011. Analysis of the potential socio-economic impactof establishing plantation forestry on rural communities in Sanga district, Niassa province, Mozambique. Land Use Policy, 28(3): 542-551. [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.001]
12. Mulyoutami, E., Rismawan, & Joshi, R.L. 2009. Local knowledge and management of simpukng (forest gardens) among the Dayak people in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Forest Ecology and Management, 257(10): 2054-2061. [DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.042]
13. Pandey, U. & Singh, J.S. 1984. Energy flower lationships between agro- and forest ecosystems in Central Himalaya. Environmental Conservation, 11(1): 45-53. [DOI:10.1017/S0376892900013485]
14. Pote, J., Shackleton, C., Cocks, M. & Lubke, R. 2006. Fuel wood harvesting and selection in Valley Thicket, South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments, 67(2): 270-287. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.02.011]
15. Raizada, A., Dogra, P. & Dhyani, B.L. 2008. Assessment of a multi objective decision support system generated land use plan on forest fodder dependency in a Himalayan watershed, Environmental modelling and software, 23(9): 1171-1181. [DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.02.001]
16. Richard, A.G., Emmanuel, K.B., Kayombo, C.J., Chirenje, L.I. & Musamba, E.B. 2011. The Influence of Socio- economic Factors on Deforestation: A Case Study of the Bereku Forest Reserve in Tanzania, Journal of Biodiversity, 2(1): 31-39 [DOI:10.1080/09766901.2011.11884727]
17. Webb, N.P., Stokes, C.J. & Marshall, N.A. 2013. Integrating biophysical and socio-economic evaluation to improve the efficacy of adaptation assessments for agriculture, Global Environmental Change, 23(5): 1164-1177. [DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.007]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.