Volume 4, Issue 2 (9-2025)
jfer 2025, 4(2): 103-119 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
tahmasebian S, Dianati tilaki G, Kooch Y, Vasinev I. (2025). Assessing floristic composition, plant life forms, and species diversity patterns across diverse forest–rangeland management regimes in Bashgol, Qazvin. , jfer. 4(2), : 8
URL: http://yujs.yu.ac.ir/jzfr/article-1-151-en.html
URL: http://yujs.yu.ac.ir/jzfr/article-1-151-en.html
Tarbiat Modares University , dianatig@modares.ac.ir
Abstract: (317 Views)
Background and objectives: Managing forest-rangeland ecosystem management and afforestation are crucial for shaping species composition, establishment, and ecosystem resilience, extending beyond mere wood or biomass production. In arid and semi-arid regions, the combined effects of grazing, water scarcity, and restoration interventions create synergistic impacts. This study investigated how these factors influence understory cover, floristic composition, life forms, and diversity indices in afforestation stands and forest habitats under various management regimes in Bashgol, Qazvin.
Materials and methods: The study was conducted in the forest-rangeland habitats of Bashgol, Qazvin Province (Central Alborz). To minimize environmental heterogeneity, sites were selected at elevations between 1480–1550 m a.s.l. and with slopes less than 10%. Five management regimes were evaluated: afforestation, exclosure, pit-seeding, light grazing, and heavy grazing. For each regime, three 100-meter transects were established, with a total of 75 plots surveyed (15 plots per regime). Along each transect, ten 1.5 m² quadrats were demarcated, and five were randomly selected for detailed measurement. Within each selected plot, cover percentage, floristic composition, and life forms were recorded. Shannon–Wiener, Simpson, Margalef, Menhinick, evenness, and alpha and beta diversity indices were calculated. These indices were then compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's test.
Results: Floristic analysis revealed that perennial species constituted the dominant component of the community, accounting for 77.63% of the total cover, while annual plants accounted for 22.37%. Among the evaluated regimes, complete exclosure exhibited the highest canopy cover (73%). Despite having lower overall vegetation cover, afforestation resulted in superior diversity metrics, achieving the highest Shannon–Wiener (1.31) and Simpson (0.38) indices. Conversely, heavy grazing recorded the lowest values for both indices (0.29 and 0.14, respectively), with these treatment differences being statistically significant. Margalef richness was also significantly influenced by management, with exclosure, afforestation, and light grazing maintaining higher richness, while heavy grazing showed the lowest. In contrast, Menhinick richness peaked under light grazing. The highest alpha (α)-diversity was observed under light grazing (2.56), whereas the lowest occurred under pit-seeding (0.63). Beta diversity reached its maximum in afforestation (0.69) and its minimum in exclosure (0.35). ANOVA confirmed that the management regime had a significant effect on both alpha and beta diversity.
Conclusion: The dominance of perennial species suggests ecological stability, while the presence of annual plants indicates responsiveness to environmental stress. Exclosure, by eliminating grazing and trampling, resulted in the highest vegetation cover. Afforestation, through the creation of microclimatic heterogeneity, fostered the highest beta diversity. The superior richness and alpha diversity observed under light grazing, coupled with their severe decline under heavy grazing, supports the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis. No single management regime optimized all indices simultaneously; therefore, the specific objectives of each site should guide the management approach. Heavy grazing leads to undesirable consequences, and a combination of rotational exclosures, controlled light grazing, and low-impact afforestation is recommended.
Materials and methods: The study was conducted in the forest-rangeland habitats of Bashgol, Qazvin Province (Central Alborz). To minimize environmental heterogeneity, sites were selected at elevations between 1480–1550 m a.s.l. and with slopes less than 10%. Five management regimes were evaluated: afforestation, exclosure, pit-seeding, light grazing, and heavy grazing. For each regime, three 100-meter transects were established, with a total of 75 plots surveyed (15 plots per regime). Along each transect, ten 1.5 m² quadrats were demarcated, and five were randomly selected for detailed measurement. Within each selected plot, cover percentage, floristic composition, and life forms were recorded. Shannon–Wiener, Simpson, Margalef, Menhinick, evenness, and alpha and beta diversity indices were calculated. These indices were then compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's test.
Results: Floristic analysis revealed that perennial species constituted the dominant component of the community, accounting for 77.63% of the total cover, while annual plants accounted for 22.37%. Among the evaluated regimes, complete exclosure exhibited the highest canopy cover (73%). Despite having lower overall vegetation cover, afforestation resulted in superior diversity metrics, achieving the highest Shannon–Wiener (1.31) and Simpson (0.38) indices. Conversely, heavy grazing recorded the lowest values for both indices (0.29 and 0.14, respectively), with these treatment differences being statistically significant. Margalef richness was also significantly influenced by management, with exclosure, afforestation, and light grazing maintaining higher richness, while heavy grazing showed the lowest. In contrast, Menhinick richness peaked under light grazing. The highest alpha (α)-diversity was observed under light grazing (2.56), whereas the lowest occurred under pit-seeding (0.63). Beta diversity reached its maximum in afforestation (0.69) and its minimum in exclosure (0.35). ANOVA confirmed that the management regime had a significant effect on both alpha and beta diversity.
Conclusion: The dominance of perennial species suggests ecological stability, while the presence of annual plants indicates responsiveness to environmental stress. Exclosure, by eliminating grazing and trampling, resulted in the highest vegetation cover. Afforestation, through the creation of microclimatic heterogeneity, fostered the highest beta diversity. The superior richness and alpha diversity observed under light grazing, coupled with their severe decline under heavy grazing, supports the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis. No single management regime optimized all indices simultaneously; therefore, the specific objectives of each site should guide the management approach. Heavy grazing leads to undesirable consequences, and a combination of rotational exclosures, controlled light grazing, and low-impact afforestation is recommended.
Article number: 8
References
1. Aghajanloo, F. & Akbarzadeh, P. (2025). Assessment of changes in biodiversity indices and plant species structure over a three-year period in Shirmisheh site, Tarom county. Journal of Renewable Natural Resources Research, 16(1): 85-105. [In Persian]
2. Ahmadvand, M., & Akhzari, D. (2024). Studying the effect of exclosure and pit-seeding on soil properties of rangelands (Case study: Darani rangelands, Tuyserkan city, Hamadan province). Human and Environment, 22(1): 1-13. [In Persian]
3. Akhzari, D. & Talebi, S. (2025). Effects of Bromus kopetdaghensis Drobov pit-seeding on soil and vegetation characteristics in a semi-arid rangeland. ECOPERSIA, 13(3): 243-252.
4. Al Hajj, N., Bricca, A., Caria, M.C., Gascòn, S., Piga, G., Pulina, A., Rivieccio, G. & Hassoun, G. (2024). Temporal trajectories of plant functional traits in mediterranean grasslands under different grazing regimes. Applied Vegetation Science, 27(3): e12807. [DOI:10.1111/avsc.12807]
5. Bakhshi, J., Javadi, S. A., Tavili, A. & Arzani, H. (2020). Study on the effects of different levels of grazing and exclosure on vegetation and soil properties in semi-arid rangelands of Iran. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(6): 425-431. [DOI:10.1016/j.chnaes.2019.07.003]
6. Dietrich, P., Ebeling, A., Meyer, S.T., Asato, A.E.B., Bröcher, M., Huang, Y., Roscher, C., Schmid, B., Vogel, A. & Eisenhauer, N. (2024). Plant diversity and community age stabilize ecosystem multifunctionality. Global Change Biology, 30(3): e17225. [DOI:10.1111/gcb.17225]
7. Fakhimi, E., Shirmardi, H.A. & Asadi, S.M. (2023). Vegetation indices and species diversity monitoring under exclosure management in semi-steppe rangelands: A case study of Ghalehgharak rangelands, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Journal of Rangeland, 17(3): 382-397. [In Persian]
8. Flinn, K.M., Vellend, M. & Marks, P.L. (2005). Environmental causes and consequences of forest clearance and agricultural abandonment in central New York, USA. Journal of Biogeography, 32(3): 439-452. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01198.x]
9. Gao, J. & Carmel, Y. (2020). A global meta-analysis of grazing effects on plant richness. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 302: 107072. [DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2020.107072]
10. Ghorbani, A., Dadjou, F., Moameri, M., Fekri, A., Sattarian, A., Cheraghi, M., Azarnivand, H. & Naseri, A. (2021). Effect of grazing exclusion on soil and vegetation characteristics in desert steppe rangelands: A case study from north-western Iran. Arid Land Research and Management, 35(1): 63-85. [DOI:10.1080/15324982.2020.1850542]
11. Herrero-Jáuregui, C. & Oesterheld, M. (2018). Effects of grazing intensity on plant richness and diversity: a meta-analysis. Oikos, 127(6): 757-766. [DOI:10.1111/oik.04893]
12. Heydari, M., Aazami, F., Faramarzi, M., Omidipour, R., Bazgir, M., Pothier, D. & Prévosto, B. (2019). Interaction between climate and management on beta diversity components of vegetation in relation to soil properties in arid and semi-arid oak forests, Iran. Journal of Arid Land, 11(1): 29-42. [DOI:10.1007/s40333-018-0024-z]
13. Jahantab, E., Khosravi Mashizi, A. & Sharafatmandrad, M. (2024). Evaluating the success of Ferula assa-foetida planting restoration operation in semi-steppe rangelands by linking functional traits to species diversity. Desert Management, 12(2): 41-54. [In Persian]
14. Komatsu, K.J., Avolio, M.L., Lemoine, N.P., Isbell, F., Grman, E., Houseman, G.R., Koerner, S.E., Johnson, D.S., Wilcox, K.R., Alatalo, J.M. & Smith, M. D. (2019). Global change effects on plant communities are magnified by time and the number of global change factors imposed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 116(36): 17867-17873.
15. Kumar, P., Lahon, D., Meraj, G. & Hashimoto, S. (2025). Projected trends in ecosystem service valuation in response to land use land cover dynamics in Kishtwar High Altitude National Park, India. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 21: 81-106. [DOI:10.1007/s11355-024-00626-5]
16. Li, Y., Wang, H., Ma, Z., Xing, P., Wang, Y., Jin, Z., Zhou, Y. & Li, F.Y. (2024). Adaptive grazing enhances plant species richness and density in the soil seed bank in a semi-arid grassland. Ecological Indicators, 163: 112113. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112113]
17. Mirzaee Moosivand, A. & Tarnian, F. (2020). Comparison of vegetation and soil characteristics in two tracts of rangeland, grazed and non-grazed (Case study: Northeast of Delfan County - Lorestan). Rangeland, 14(2): 171-183. [In Persian]
18. Nadaf-Fard, L., Ramezani, M., Haghverdi, K., Khorasani, N. & Homasi, A.H. (2021). Composition and biodiversity of understory plants in natural and plantation forest stands in Kelarabad, Chalous. Journal of Natural Environment, 74(1): 181-193. [In Persian]
19. Nawaz, A. & Afzal, M. K. (2025). Influence of grazing intensity and regime on soil nitrogen fixation dynamics in alpine grasslands. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 20250225847.
20. Omidipour, R., Tahmasebi, P., Ebrahimi, A. & Nadaf, M. (2021). Investigating the effect of animal grazing management on composition and spatial diversity indices (Case study: Broujen rangelands, Charmahal and Bakhtiari). Integrated Watershed Management, 1(1): 63-79. [In Persian].
21. Rahmanian, S., Hejda, M., Ejtehadi, H., Erfanzadeh, R., Pirkhezri, S.Z., Razavi, B.S. & Török, P. (2019). Effects of livestock grazing on soil, plant functional diversity, and ecological traits vary between regions with different climates in northeastern Iran. Ecology and Evolution, 9(14): 8225-8237. [DOI:10.1002/ece3.5396]
22. Rastgar, S., Lamani, A., Jafarian, Z., Heydari, G.A. & Ghorbanpour Delivand, M. (2026). Analysis and evaluation of multipurpose range management plans in eastern Mazandaran province. Rangeland, 20(1): 14-33. [In Persian]
23. Samadi Khangah, S., Ghorbani, A., Choukali, M. A., Moameri, M., Badrzadeh, M. & Motamedi, J. (2021). Effects of grazing exclosure on vegetation characteristics and soil properties in the Mahabad Sabzepoush rangelands, Iran. Ecopersia, 9(2): 139-152.
24. Wang, C., Han, G., Jia, Y., Feng, X., Tian, X., Sha, Z. & Khaled, M. (2020). Response of soil and plant carbon, nitrogen and their stoichiometry to grazing exclusion: A global synthesis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 291: 106803.
25. Zhao, G., Zhang, Z., Tariq, A., Sabit, R., Sardans, J., Graciano, C., Li, X., Zhu, Y., Peñuelas, J., Al-Bakre, D.A. & Zeng, F. (2025). Grazing exclusion significantly reduced soil organic carbon stocks but enhanced soil inorganic carbon stocks in desert steppe of northwest China. Ecological Indicators, 172: 113341. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113341]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
