Volume 7, Issue 1 (3-2018)
Plant Pathol. Sci. 2018, 7(1): 1-14 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bakhshi M. (2018). Important Criteria for Identification of the Cercospora Species. Plant Pathol. Sci.. 7(1), 1-14. doi:10.29252/pps.7.1.1
URL: http://yujs.yu.ac.ir/pps/article-1-216-en.html
URL: http://yujs.yu.ac.ir/pps/article-1-216-en.html
Department of Botany, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran. , mounesbakhshi@gmail.com
Abstract: (6927 Views)
Bakhshi M. 2018. Important criteria for identification of the Cercospora species. Plant Pathology Science 7(1):1-14.
Species of the genus Cercospora are important plant pathogenic fungi with worldwide distribution. They are often associated with leaf spots, occurring on a wide range of hosts in almost all major families of dicots, most monocot families, and even some gymnosperms and ferns. Different characteristics, such as morphology, toxin production and host specificity were used to distinguish species. New research findings have shown that a polyphasic approach, combining morphological, ecological and phylogenetic species concepts, which are discussed in this article, proved the most effective method to distinguish species of the genus Cercospora. Accurate identification of these plant pathogens is the first step to adopt the appropriate management strategies for their disease control. Therefor, it is recommended that, in order to accurate identification of the species of the genus Cercospora, they should be studied and reviewed on the basis of these criteria.
Species of the genus Cercospora are important plant pathogenic fungi with worldwide distribution. They are often associated with leaf spots, occurring on a wide range of hosts in almost all major families of dicots, most monocot families, and even some gymnosperms and ferns. Different characteristics, such as morphology, toxin production and host specificity were used to distinguish species. New research findings have shown that a polyphasic approach, combining morphological, ecological and phylogenetic species concepts, which are discussed in this article, proved the most effective method to distinguish species of the genus Cercospora. Accurate identification of these plant pathogens is the first step to adopt the appropriate management strategies for their disease control. Therefor, it is recommended that, in order to accurate identification of the species of the genus Cercospora, they should be studied and reviewed on the basis of these criteria.
References
1. Arzanlou M., Abeln E.C., Kema G.H., Waalwijk C., Carlier J., Vries I.D., Guzmán M. and Crous P.W. 2007. Molecular diagnostics for the Sigatoka disease complex of banana. Phytopathology 97:1112–1118. [DOI:10.1094/PHYTO-97-9-1112]
2. Bakhshi M., Arzanlou M. and Babai-Ahari A. 2011. Uneven distribution of mating type alleles in Iranian populations of Cercospora beticola, the causal agent of Cercospora leaf spot disease of sugar beet. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 50:101–109.
3. Bakhshi M., Arzanlou M. and Babai-Ahari A. 2012b. Morphological and molecular characterization of Cercospora zebrina from black bindweed in Iran. Plant Pathology and Quarantine 2:125–130. [DOI:10.5943/ppq/2/2/5]
4. Bolton M.D., Secor G.A., Rivera V., Weiland J.J., Rudolph K., Birla K., Rengifo J. and Campbell L.G. 2012. Evaluation of the potential for sexual reproduction in field populations of Cercospora beticola from USA. Fungal Biology 116:511–521. [DOI:10.1016/j.funbio.2012.01.011]
5. Braun U., Nakashima C. and Crous P.W. 2013. Cercosporoid fungi (Mycosphaerellaceae) 1. species on other fungi, Pteridophyta and Gymnospermae. IMA Fungus 4:265–345. [DOI:10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.02.12]
6. Chupp C. 1954. A monograph of the fungus genus Cercospora. Ithaca, New York. 667p.
7. Coppin E., Debuchy R., Arnaise S. and Picard M. 1997. Mating types and sexual development in filamentous ascomycetes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 61:411–428.
8. Crous P. W. and Braun U. 2003. Mycosphaerella and its anamorphs: 1. Names published in Cercospora and Passalora. CBS Biodiversity Series 1: 1–571.
9. Crous P. W. and Wingfield M.J. 1996. Species of Mycosphaerella and their anamorphs associated with leaf blotch disease of Eucalyptus in South Africa. Mycologia 441–458. [DOI:10.1080/00275514.1996.12026671]
10. Crous P. W., Groenewald J.Z., Groenewald M., Caldwell P., Braun U. and Harrington T.C. 2006a. Species of Cercospora associated with grey leaf spot of maize. Studies in Mycology 55:189–197. [DOI:10.3114/sim.55.1.189]
11. Crous P. W., Groenewald J. Z., Mansilla J. P., Hunter G. C. and Wingfield M. J. 2004. Phylogenetic reassessment of Mycosphaerella spp. and their anamorphs occurring on Eucalyptus. Studies in Mycology 50:195–214.
12. Crous P. W., Schoch C. L., Hyde K. D., Wood A. R., Gueidan C., de Hoog G. S. and Groenewald J. Z. 2009. Phylogenetic lineages in the Capnodiales. Studies in Mycology 64:17–47. [DOI:10.3114/sim.2009.64.02]
13. Ellis M. B. 1971. Dematiaceous hyphomycetes. Kew, UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute,
14. Fuckel K. W. 1863. Fungi Rhenani exsiccati, Fasc. I-IV. Hedwigia 2:132–136.
15. Groenewald J. Z., Groenewald M., Braun U. and Crous P. W. 2010. Cercospora Speciation And Host Range. Pp. 21–37. In: R. T. Lartey, J. Weiland, L. Panella, P. W. Crous, and C. Windels, (ed.). Cercospora Leaf Spot of Sugar Beet and Related Species. APS Press, Minnesota, USA.
16. Groenewald J. Z., Nakashima C., Nishikawa J., Shin H. D., Park J. H., Jama A. N., Groenewald M., Braun U. and Crous, P. W. 2013. Species concepts in Cercospora: spotting the weeds among the roses. Studies in Mycology 75:115–170. [DOI:10.3114/sim0012]
17. Groenewald M., Groenewald J. Z. and Crous P. W. 2005. Distinct species exist within the Cercospora apii morphotype. Phytopathology 95:951–959. [DOI:10.1094/PHYTO-95-0951]
18. Groenewald M., Groenewald J.Z., Braun U. and Crous P. W. 2006a. Host range of Cercospora apii and C. beticola and description of C. apiicola, a novel species from celery. Mycologia 98:275–285. [DOI:10.1080/15572536.2006.11832700]
19. Groenewald M., Groenewald J. Z., Harrington T. C., Abeln E. C. and Crous P. W. 2006b. Mating type gene analysis in apparently asexual Cercospora species is suggestive of cryptic sex. Fungal Genetics and Biology 43:813-825. [DOI:10.1016/j.fgb.2006.05.008]
20. Hawksworth D. L., Crous P. W., Redhead S. A., Reynolds D. R., Samson R. A., Seifert K. A., Taylor J. W., Wingfield M. J., Abaci Ö. and Aime C. 2011. The Amsterdam declaration on fungal nomenclature. IMA Fungus 2:105–112. [DOI:10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.01.14]
21. Kimber R. B. E. and Paull J. G. 2011. Identification and genetics of resistance to cercospora leaf spot (Cercospora zonata) in faba bean (Vicia faba). Euphytica 177:419–429. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-010-0288-7]
22. Kirk P. M., Stalpers J. A., Braun U., Crous P. W., Hansen K., Hawksworth D. L., Hyde K. D., Lücking R., Lumbsch T. H. and Rossman A. Y. 2013. A without-prejudice list of generic names of fungi for protection under the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. IMA Fungus 4:381–443. [DOI:10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.02.17]
23. Lartey R., Caesar-TonThat T., Caesar A., Shelver W., Sol N. and Bergman J. 2005. Safflower: A new host of Cercospora beticola. Plant Disease 89:797–801. [DOI:10.1094/PD-89-0797]
24. Linde C. C., Zala M., Ceccarelli S. and McDonald B. A. 2003. Further evidence for sexual reproduction in Rhynchosporium secalis based on distribution and frequency of mating-type alleles. Fungal Genetics and Biology 40:115–125. [DOI:10.1016/S1087-1845(03)00110-5]
25. Moretti M., Saracchi M. and Farina G. 2004. Morphological, physiological and genetic diversity within a small population of Cercospora beticola Sacc. Annals of Microbiology 54:129–150.
26. Pollack F. G. 1987. An annotated compilation of Cercospora names. Mycological Memoirs 12:1–212.
27. Praveena R. and Naseema A. 2004. Fungi occurring on water hyacinth [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms] in Kerala. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 42:21–23
28. Quaedvlieg W., Binder M., Groenewald J. Z., Summerell B. A., Carnegie A. J., Burgess T. I. and Crous P. W. 2014. Introducing the Consolidated Species Concept to resolve species in the Teratosphaeriaceae. Persoonia 33:1–40. [DOI:10.3767/003158514X681981]
29. Silva M. and Pereira O. L. 2008. Postharvest Cercospora apii fruit rot disease on Cucurbita maxima (Cucurbitaceae). Australasian Plant Disease Notes 3:21–23. [DOI:10.1071/DN08009]
30. Tessmann D.J., Charudattan R., Kistler H.C. and Rosskopf E.N. 2001. A molecular characterization of Cercospora species pathogenic to water hyacinth and emendation of C. piaropi. Mycologia 93: 323–334. [DOI:10.2307/3761654]
31. Weiland J., Eide J., Rivera-Varas V. and Secor G. 2001. Genetic diversity of Cercospora beticola in the US and association of molecular markers with tolerance to the fungicide triphenytlin hydroxide. Phytopathology 91: 94.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
